News

Brief: Securing a high-ambition outcome on fossil fuel subsidies in the Second Global Stocktake

With momentum stalling since the COP28 call to phase out “inefficient” fossil fuel subsidies, the launch of the Second Global Stocktake (GST2) at COP31 in November 2026 offers a window to embed structural subsidy reform directly into UNFCCC processes. Building on real-world phase-out plans and national inventories—particularly from members of the Coalition on Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Incentives including Subsidies (COFFIS)—this briefing outlines the first steps towards securing ambitious language on fossil fuel subsidy reform in a GST2 decision. You can download the briefing here. Download the brief

Read More »

Holding COFFIS members to account: Both ENDS complaint exposes credibility gap on fossil fuel subsidy reform

The COFFIS Observatory welcomes the climate complaint filed by Both ENDS with the European Commission’s Single Entry Point under the EU-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The agreement, which entered into force in 2024, contains provisions regarding climate and sustainable development. Notably, neither side may weaken environmental laws to encourage trade or investment, and each side must implement the Paris Agreement, refraining from any action or omission that undermine its objectives. The complaint, submitted on 29 September 2026, challenges New Zealand’s systematic rollbacks of environmental standards, including the introduction of new subsidies supporting fossil fuel production in the country. New Zealand

Read More »

Discussion paper: Policy options for a framework for the phase out of fossil fuel subsidies in European Union

Addressing the upcoming Q4 2026 European Commission framework on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies requires balancing climate ambition with legal feasibility, as measures mandating direct subsidy removal touch national fiscal policy and require unanimous Council approval. Following a previous high-level paper, this discussion paper puts forward two options. As a highly ambitious benchmark, Option 1, the “Hard Deadline” approach, is proposed. It introduces a dedicated new regulation setting binding Union-wide phase-out timelines alongside targeted amendments to existing governance legislation. While providing maximum policy ambition and clarity, it carries a high risk of political gridlock due to the Council unanimity requirement. In

Read More »

COFFIS Observatory rates Dutch fossil fuel subsidy phase-out plan “unambitious”

The COFFIS Observatory has released its assessment of the 2025 Netherlands Fossil Fuel Subsidy (FFS) Phase-out Plan. Evaluating the framework against the COFFIS Observatory methodology (v0.1p – Alpha), the assessment awards the Dutch plan an overall score of just 11 out of a possible 50 points. The report cites a critical lack of legal force, weak  timelines, and a complete absence of safeguards against  backtracking, raising concerns over the commitment of the current COFFIS chair. While the assessment notes that the Netherlands demonstrated transparency by publishing an accessible inventory in both Dutch and English, the core strategy remains highly unambitious. A

Read More »